Thursday, August 31, 2017

9th November Maynooth University Library - The Librarian as Academic Author: Further Developing Your Scholarly Writing

I'm looking forward to the launch of Librarian as Communicator: Case Studies and International Perspectives edited by myself and Graham Walton, at Maynooth University Library on 9th November. The launch at 4p.m. will be preceded by a seminar on academic writing.
The programme and booking information will be available shortly.


Latest issue of SCONUL Focus - on research support - now available

Issue 69 of SCONUL Focus is now published.  The theme is research support.
Alex Kouker, now at DCU, and Jane Buggle, DBS have an interesting article aboutresearch and scholarly activity at Dublin Business School.  It's on pages 47-50.
I've an article on being an editor of a themed issue of New Review of Academic Librarianship on pages 62-64.

Helen 


Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Call for Proposals Electronic Resources & Libraries Conference

This conference will take place at the University of Texas at Austin from March 4-7, 2018.
Submissions for 45 or 15 minutes sessions on the following topics:
Managing e-resources and licensing; collection development and assessment; organizational strategies, external relationships; user experience and promotion; scholarly communication and library publishing; emerging technologies and trends.
Submission date: Friday 15 September
More information




Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Call for papers Themed Issue on Emergent Literacies in Academic Libraries

The peer-reviewed Emerald Journal  Reference Services Review

seeks papers  the theme of emergent literacies in academic libraries. Articles in this issue will explore emergent literacies, intersections of multiple literacies, and ideas around the language used to describe, implement, and assess these literacies. We are interested in innovative interpretations and intersectional research around ideas, theory, and practice.
Key Dates:
Proposals/abstracts due: October 15, 2017.
The theme issue, Volume 46 Issue 2, will be published in June 2018. Manuscripts must be submitted by February 24, 2018. Submitted manuscripts are evaluated using a double-blind peer review process. Authors can expect to work on revisions in February and March 2018. Final manuscripts will be due by April 7, 2018.
Examples of stand-alone and intersectional topics include, but are not restricted to,:
  • Cultural Literacies (International, Indigenous, Economic)
  • Spatial Literacies (How do we create physical and virtual spaces for intellectual pursuits?)
  • Emotional Literacies (Changing demographics of higher education, Inclusivity)
  • Life Skill Literacies (Finance, Self-advocacy, Speaking, Privacy)
  • Narrative Literacies (How do we tell our story? How do students share their stories?)
  • Oral Literacies (Listening, Speaking)
  • Written and Expressive Literacies (Writing, Visual, Performance)
  • Digital & Multimedia Literacies (Social Media, Copyright, Digital media authoring)
  • Literacies across the arc of K-20 education
  • Methodology, pedagogy, and assessment of emergent literacies
  • Forthcoming technologies or developments may create new emerging literacies
  • Intersection of Emergent Literacies & Digital Humanities
Proposed manuscripts may take many forms, including (but not limited to) innovative applications of best practices, literature reviews, or conceptual papers that explore the future of emerging literacies.
We wholeheartedly welcome submissions on emergent literacies and/or approaches not listed above. We encourage manuscripts that explore innovative intersections of various literacies, approaches, and pedagogical approaches.

Send proposals/abstracts or inquiries to both:
Tammy Ivins, Transfer Student Services Librarian at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and
Sylvia Tag  Librarian for Colleges/Departments/Programs at Western Washington University

Monday, August 28, 2017

Practitioner research and academic libraries

Liz Walkey Hall from Flinders University Library shared the following interesting presentation/publications with me

McBain, I., Culshaw, H. and Walkley Hall, L., 2013. Establishing a culture of research practice in an academic library: an Australian case study. Library management, 34(6/7), pp.448-461.

Hall, L.W. and McBain, I., 2014. Practitioner research in an academic library: evaluating the impact of a support group. The Australian Library Journal, 63(2), pp.129-143.

Hall, L.W., 2015. Changing the workplace culture at Flinders University library: From pragmatism to professional reflection. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 46(1), pp.29-38.


Liz Walkley Hall
Open Scholarship and Data Management Librarian
Flinders University Library
GPO Box 2100
ADELAIDE  SA  5001
Ph 08 8201 3080

Friday, August 25, 2017

Call for Project Presentations - Open Science Conference, Berlin 13-14 March 2018

  • Abstract submission deadline: September 29, 2017
  • Notification of acceptance / rejection: November 13, 2017
  • Final abstract and poster submission: February, 05, 2018
  • Conference dates: Berlin (Germany), March 13–14, 2018

Using the 5 minute hour glass in your academic writing!

Jane Burns has updated her entry in Top Tips from Published Authors section and has included some really useful resources


Update on Writing Tips – 2017
I still use the tips outlined in my original post  but have developed a few more good writing practices that other writers might find useful.  The most significant addition to my writing work space is the use of twitter for resources and for practicing writing coherently and efficiently (a limit of 140 characters really helps stop the waffling!)
Some useful Twitter accounts I follow and recommend are listed below. They offer great tips and lots of inspiration!
PhD Forum @PhDForum


The other addition to my writing toolkit was the recent purchase of a 5 minute hour glass. I used this in 2 really effective ways. The first is for timed writing. I force myself to do a 5 minute concentrated writing session every day.  The topics can vary but it gets the writing part of my brain activated! The other way I use the hour glass is when I need to take a break and the sand in the glass then becomes by 5 minute limit for a hop on to social media!

Rudaí 23 (23 Things) online course available free of charge and certified by Library Association of Ireland

Delighted to see this is running again. It's a great opportunity to learn more about social media and much more.  There's a useful blog post by Saoirse Reynolds on her experience of doing the course.

Dr Philip Cohen, President LAI, presents Saoirse Reynolds with her certificate
Pic. WRSLAI

Below are more details from the organisers. 
The Western Regional Section of the Library Association of Ireland are thrilled to announce a new free online 23 Things course, starting in September 2017. This is our second time running this course, and we are very excited to tell you about all the new things that we are including in this one.
Rudaí (translates from the Irish as ‘thing’) 23  is based on the 23 Things learning programme designed in 2010 by librarian Helene Blowers for the staff of the Charlotte Mecklenburg library, North Carolina. Our programme is designed to introduce professionals working in an information/library environment to new web tools and apps currently being used to promote libraries and enhance library service-provision worldwide. We will also introduce tools and apps used for collaborating, networking and sharing your work.
This course is for anyone working in the information profession that might be looking for opportunities in continuing professional development, exploring the world of apps and web tools, networking online with like-minded professional and developing your online professional profile.
The program consists of 23 modules which will be delivered free and online via our course website: Participants can choose which modules to complete and earn up to 5 digital open badges:
Visual Communicator, Online Networker, Critical Thinker, Engaged Professional and CPD Champion.
Participants must complete a series of simple tasks such as learning how to use different presentation software like PowToon, or maybe you would like to know more about collaboration tools such as Basecamp. Learning includes reflecting so we ask you to write an online blog post about your experiences which in turn lets you earn the relevant badges.
This course, including the open digital badges that you earn, is certified by the Library Association of Ireland and can be used in your CPD portfolio.
We would encourage anyone interested in doing this course to speak to your employer about allowing time to complete it. Online learning is a valuable part of continuing professional development and can be a viable alternative to attending conferences or training if distance or financial constraints are impeding factors for you.
Please download the brochure which contains information on the time required to do the course as well as information on the module content.
Registration for Rudaí 23 will open on the 28th of August and the first module will begin on the 9th of September.

For more information email westernlibraries@gmail.com and follow us on twitter @rudaí23 @wrslai to receive updates and don’t forget the hashtags #rudaí23 #23things.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Latest issue of New Review of Academic Librarianship now online

The 2017 themed issue of New Review of Academic Librarianship is now online.  The theme is
Supporting Researchers: Sustainable innovation in strategy and services.  Great to see papers from around the globe and congratulations to John Cox on his article New Directions for Academic Libraries in Research Staffing: A Case Study at National University of Ireland Galway.


Thursday, August 17, 2017

Call for contributions - LIR HEAnet User Group Annual Seminar

Cultivating Libraries in a Post Digital Learning Ecosystem
The 2017 LIR Annual Seminar takes place on Friday, November 24th,
Long Room Hub, Trinity College Dublin.
This year’s seminar explores both the challenges, and opportunities confronting libraries, as they devise sustainable strategies, to navigate and flourish in a post digital learning ecosystem.  In these virtual learning spaces, Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) plays a significant role simultaneously generating and analysing data, which contributes to improving an individual’s overall performance. The focus for libraries being primarily their ability to utilise technology to engage and enhance their user’s experience of resources and services to maximum effect.
 These issues and related sub-themes are explored in greater depth by our confirmed  
 Keynote speakers
David White - Head of Technology Enhanced Learning - University of Arts London,
 Lee O’ Farrell - "Project Manager - Learning Analytics" National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
Other invited speakers -TBC.

We would like to invite proposals for short presentations to give attendees a chance to demonstrate how your organisation is embracing these new challenges and opportunities posed by constantly evolving technologies.

Short presentations will be 20 minutes each. Examples of suggested topics include but are not limited to the following:
·        Copyright
·        Reading List Software
·        Data Support
·        Developing a library presence in a VLE/LMS
·        Supporting Digital Humanities
This is an excellent opportunity to showcase innovative and interesting developments within your own institution. Abstracts for presentations should be a limited to 200 words.

Expressions of interest, and proposals for short presentations (should be forwarded to LIRCTTE@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE by, September 25th.
Details of previous LIR events,and upcoming workshops can be found at http://lirgroup.heanet.ie/

Chair, LIR Committee

The Journal Editors Perspective - Emma Coonan Journal of Information Literacy

Guest post by Emma Coonan, Editor-in-Chief of the peer-reviewed open access Journal of Information Literacy


After several years of peer reviewing and two years of editor-in-chiefing, I’ve managed to boil down what I’m looking for in a journal article to five bullet points:
  • An original contribution to the field
  • A research-informed and evidence-based approach
  • Designed around an arguable research question
  • Contextualised with reference to previous and current advances in IL thinking
  • Methodologically robust with a demonstrable research design
So at JIL we’re looking for research that helps readers understand a new development in information literacy, or understand existing thinking more deeply; that builds on evidence from other literature to back up its arguments; and that shows that the writer did some thinking and planning about what they wanted the research to achieve before they went ahead and did it.

Don’t be scared by the M word - methodology. It brings a lot of people out in hives, but having a clear and well applied method is simultaneously essential for a research article and not as terrifying as it’s often made to sound. The simplest way to think about it is to remember that a research article is about investigation, not description. JIL has a separate section for sharing good practice, where you can tell us about your teaching practice and resource design, but to be published in the peer-reviewed research articles section, your paper needs to not just describe what you did, but also say:
  •      why it needed to be done to start with
  •         why you went about it the way you did
  •         how you made sure the process wasn’t full of assumptions, errors, biases and holes

If you look at a few papers in your field, especially ones from the journal you’d like to publish in, you’ll see how this investigative approach translates into a written article. You can also use a handout I made, based on xkcd’s ‘Thing Explainer’, that describes the structure of a journal article in simple language. You can see it on my blog or download a copy.
 
It’s a brave thing to release your writing into the wild. Showing other people what you’ve written can make you feel vulnerable; receiving even the most kindly framed criticism might make you feel (temporarily) homicidal. There’s a brilliant Storify on dealing with reviewer comments, and you should also engrave the following principles on your heart:
  •  Journals have a specific scope and remit
  • If your article doesn’t fit, maybe the container is the wrong shape. Try a different journal: your work has something to say to somebody.
  • ‘Resubmit’ doesn’t mean ‘Reject’. It’s been known for authors to react as though they’re the same thing. If you’ve been invited to resubmit your work for further review, it means they like it
  • Reviewers and editors are writers too
and we know it sucks to have your writing criticised. At JIL we make a point of giving authors constructive, practical, workable suggestions for how you could improve your paper. We aim to not only be humane, but objective and evidence-based: the same principles that apply to all scholarly communication. 

Sunday, August 13, 2017

The Journal Editor's Perspective - Reference Services Review


Guest post by Eleanor Mitchell and  Sarah Barbara Watstein




As co-editors of Reference Services Review (RSR), we hope that authors will enjoy the authoring and publication experience; the following tips and aha’s promise to make the academic writing journey a fulfilling one!

  1. Why Write? Why Publish? Before you begin, think about why you want to write and publish. Do you want to demonstrate or share expertise? Advance in your position or career? Obtain funding? Develop/build community? Enhance the visibility of your institution/library/program? Do writing and publication bring you professional or personal satisfaction? Reflecting on why you want to write and publish at the head end of your work ensures both focus and momentum.
  2. Journal Options: Identify and assess journal options (publishing options/outlets). Review the journal purpose, editorial objectives, availability, intended audience, guidance for potential authors, colleague-mentoring opportunities.
  3. The Right Fit: Select the appropriate journal for your topic, your style and approach, your preferred audience, your time-frame.  If you have an off -hand, editorial style of writing, and use an informal tone, make sure the journal you are considering publishes this sort of writing.  However, sometimes, in our journal (Reference Services Review) we will include an opinion piece or an interview or a point-counterpoint style article if the topic seems provocative and relevant. Similarly, sometimes a submission may seem tangential or almost off-topic for our areas of focus; with additional work and refocusing, articles of this sort have become among the most highly downloaded by our readers.  If your topic and perspective are compelling, take a chance.
  4. Making Contact: If you have questions about whether or not a journal is “the right fit,” contact the editor or co-editor, attend conferences or events and stop by the publisher’s booth(s), reach out to members of the journal’s Editorial Advisory Board, or track down published authors.
  5. Author Guidelines: Adhere to manuscript requirements (format; tables, figures and illustrations; references”) and follow manuscript submission guidelines.
  6. Manuscript Submission: Submit your best and final work: don’t send something half-baked or clearly unedited. However, RSR has a long editorial tradition, established by our long time founding editor and legend Ilene Rockman, of working closely with authors, particularly first time authors, to help them at different points in the process. Whether it is sharpening the thesis, clarifying the arguments, or bringing additional sources or perspectives to bear, our reviewers and editors often provide essential guidance. Frequently authors will correspond with us outside the submission process to jump start their writing process.
  7. The Editorial Process: Familiarize yourself with the manuscript review and revision process for the journal you’ve selected.
  8. The Revising Process – Do’s and Don’ts: Do read the reviews carefully. Decide whether to revise or not. As you revise, take care to respond to the reviewer’s/reviewers’ comments. And, take care to complete your revisions in a timely manner. When in doubt, check in with the journal editor. Remember not to internalize or personalize the reviewer’s/reviewers’ comments.
  9. Copyright, Permissions and Access: Familiarize yourself with the copyright and permissions policies of the journal, including guidance on published article reuse by authors and others. Some journals/publishers assist authors in fulfilling funder open access mandates by depositing the accepted version of their article in a designated public repository within the required time period.
  10. If Your Article is Rejected: Read the reviews carefully. Consider the reasons provided. Either plan to rewrite/resubmit or plan to resubmit elsewhere.






Librarians doing research, PhDs etc

Thursday, August 10, 2017

The Journal Editor's Perspective - JOLIS

Guest post by 

@AnneGoulding


Previous Editors have provided some sound advice in the Top Tips from journal editors section, so I’ll just pick up on a few points in the context of submitting to JOLIS. 

1.    Guidelines:  Firstly, reading the Guidelines for Authors carefully is a must.  Not only will this help you prepare your manuscript in the correct format but the Guidelines also indicate the scope of the journal and whether your paper will be a good fit.  Take a look at previous issues and the “About” page on the journal homepage to check this out, too.  Two basic items you should look out for when formatting are anonymity – ensure there’s no identifying information including self-citations; and referencing – please use the house style.
2.    Implications of the research: For JOLIS, the practical implications of any research for library and information services is very important. These should be highlighted in the Introduction, with an explanation of the practical problem or issues the research is investigating, and the Discussion/Conclusion which should draw out lessons to be learnt and how the research contributes to practice.  Case studies from one country or even one institution are acceptable but you need to spend some time in your paper discussing the relevance of your findings for a wider, international audience and for library or information service practice more generally.
3.    Literature review: We also expect a thorough and critical literature review so that we can see that authors have engaged with relevant theory and the body of knowledge in our discipline and often beyond.  The literature review should be a thematic synthesis of previous work, not just a listing of previous studies and their findings one by one.  Again, the Conclusion should indicate how the work adds to our knowledge and understanding of the topic and, if appropriate, how it builds on or contributes to relevant theory.  It’s also a good idea to cite relevant work from the journal to which you are submitting!  It shows that you are familiar with the journal and have thought about the best outlet for your paper.
4.    Communication: We welcome submissions from around the globe. JOLIS is committed to publishing the best international research but please ensure that if you are not writing in your own language that your work is thoroughly proofread and copyedited before submission.  We can’t do this for you and if the quality of communication is poor, you run the risk of your paper being a desk-reject, i.e. rejected before peer review.  Most journal publishers offer editing services, although you generally have to pay for these.

5.    Reviewers’ Comments: Finally, I echo the thoughts of previous posts; please don’t feel affronted by the comments of reviewers.  I know (as an author myself) that it’s difficult not to be dismayed at negative comments on your carefully crafted piece.  But remember, incredibly few papers are accepted without some kind of revision and reviewers are genuinely trying to offer you constructive guidance so you can make your paper even better! 

Monday, August 7, 2017

Librarians Transitioning to Researchers, Writers, and other Academic Opportunities.

Having the opportunity to work with other librarians from different organisations is a great way to share ideas, gain insights and to reinforce your professional networks.  The Annual CONUL conference is a fantastic event to get together with other Academic Librarians and learn about what kinds of areas they have been involved in. This year we decided to build on the work  we had presented at the Library of Congress Submit of the Book Conference (with Helen Fallon, Maynooth University) in Nov. 2016 and present to colleagues our professional journeys in the research and writing areas.
Post CONUL conference there was follow up requests for all kinds of information and one in particular was a request to pull together highlights of the presentation for the Academic Librarian Blog. As each of us identified in our presentation, Helen Fallon and her support for all library staff moving into the writing space was the one common factor that inspired us and gave us confidence to endeavour into writing for academic publications; submitting our tips to readers of this blog seemed a natural route.

MaryDelaney’s tips & insights


Research to date
My interest in research was sparked initially from my work as a Subject Librarian in Maynooth University when I helped others to do research. In more recent years I spent and continue to spend a significant amount of time building a library service to enhance research practices. Helping someone to find the evidence to build their best argument is a critical skill that libraries and library staff bring to the table, in the complex world of digital and print information. We have a key role to play as curators and consumers of information. My own research initially focused on practice based research (writing about specific library issues such as opening hours for SCONUL FOCUS for example) and this evolved into an interest in exploring more theoretical based research.  This interest was sparked by a curiosity to explore if carrying out doctoral research would help me to empathise more with research students and staff by gaining an insight into the research journey which could further inform the development of library services.  Additionally I was interested in bringing Library & Information Science work outside of the field and situating it into the wider field of Education.
I signed up to undertake part time Doctoral Research with the University of Sheffield. My intention was to carry out research on the topic of “Information Literacy” but in the field of Education. My supervisor was not from a library background. One of his many areas of expertise is literacy. This worked well for me as he was very well placed to help me situate information literacy (IL) into the wider context of literacy, pedagogy and Education. My research focused on the literacy part of information literacy and explores IL as a critical literacy for success in the complex Higher Education information landscape. My thesis is titled “Concept, Ownership and Impact of Information Literacy in a Higher Education setting in Ireland”. The thesis required a different research approach and writing style to what I completed before and in both cases this was related to having a longer more sustained project with a large word count.
Benefits and insights
Having completed the process I am very grateful I had the opportunity to do it. The process gave me a greater understanding of the demands and challenges faced when undertaking research. Furthermore, it gave me an insight into the student experience of finding, using and managing information. The opportunity to bring ideas from Library and Information Science into Education helped me to bring thoughts from one field to another and vice versa while also highlighting areas of commonality. Additionally the opportunity allowed me to meet staff from different Third Level settings in different discipline areas with a common goal of completing doctoral research in the field of Education. This provided a great opportunity to meet colleagues I may not have met otherwise. It is important as library staff that we communicate with our wider audiences and by working with colleagues outside of our libraries we can gain valuable experience and insight into not only the research process but also into the wider Educational environment in which we all operate. 
Advice for others
This is a growth area and we are uniquely positioned to pursue it. My advice to anyone considering undertaking a research project is to go for it. There is a vastly growing community who will help!

Ciara McCaffrey's tips & insights

My research experience
As Deputy Librarian at the University of Limerick,  together with the Library Director and the management group, I  have an overarching remit to continually improve library services in UL.  To do that well we need to generate evidence through assessment and data gathering.  It is through  library assessment that my engagement with research and publishing has developed over the years.
The type of research I've engaged in, as many of us have in our libraries, is practitioner-led research.  Sometimes called action research - action oriented - applied - there are many names for it; it is done in a practical setting,  by practitioners.  There are estimates that between 50-60% of research articles in LIS journals emanate from practising librarians and many high ranking LIS journals welcome practice-based research.  It is also common in other applied fields, such as education, health sciences and business.
I've published in academic journals and been through peer review three times, twice have been in Q1 percentile journals in the Scopus list, another recently submitted to a journal, and I have been a peer reviewer in a Q1 percentile journal on one occasion.  So my experience is modest - enough to speak with some confidence but not enough to have forgotten the feeling of newness.
The type of research projects I've been involved in, worked with others on for some and have published on include:
·         The use and perceptions of LibQUAL+ in Irish academic libraries
·         Exploring & finding solutions to the issue of noise and the provision of quiet space in academic libraries
·         Exploring & finding solutions to the issue of desk reserving - students leaving belongings on desks for long periods - and the constraints that causes in space management
·         I am currently looking at a decade of transformation at UL Library through a longitudinal analysis of survey data from the last 10 years
The research methods I've used include user surveys, mostly LibQUAL+ which is very well tested as a research tool.  I've also used interviews and more recently focus groups and local user surveys.
The purpose of my research is to improve practice in UL Library and to inform practice elsewhere.  It is very evidence-based and applied.  The assessment is closely connected with my work but the publications and more of the deeper research and data analysis I do as more a continuing professional development activity.



Benefits and insights
From a professional perspective, engaging in research has upskilled me in all aspects of scholarly communication.  I think it is really important for all librarians to have a good understanding of the research process, regardless of what area or role you work in.  However if you don't work directly with researchers, concepts like open access, research data management, data visualisation, impact factors, etc. can seem quite abstract.   By engaging in research you get a good understanding of what these mean in a real life sense, why they are important and where the library fits.
This understanding has informed my job - in recruiting new roles, in developing UL library staff skills in scholarly communications, in library-wide planning.  Strategically it has strengthened my understanding of university strategy and national and international educational strategy, which is dominated by the research agenda
From a personal perspective, it is a great CPD activity that fits well into a very busy job and family life.  It is self-motivated so you do it when you have the time and when life is busy you don't.
The greatest benefit - and the reason I keep doing it - has been to see through the eyes of a researcher, in so far as I can, and there are many insights to be gained from this perspective, as both Mary and Jane will echo.  The one I'd like to share with you today is about the language we use in librarianship in relation to scholarly communications, in supporting researchers and particularly in advocacy.
I think we need to speak the same language as researchers and particularly focus on the 'what's in it for me' aspect When I'm wearing my researcher hat, what I want to know is what will make my research better, easier, faster, more organised, and critically, increase its impact.  Essentially how can the library help me to communicate my research more widely

Advice for others
Here are my tips and advice on getting started with practice-based research:
·         Start by writing a non-research based article
·         If conducting primary research, connect it closely to your work
·         Plan your research methods carefully
·         Get advice from an academic colleague or an experienced author
·         Present at a conference before writing it up
·         Look at journals you like for topics, methods and styles – aim high and think about open access.  Here are the ones that I follow and that welcome practice-based research, but there are many others depending on your interests:
·         College & Research Libraries


For most of us who have published, we started with Helen Fallon and the Academic WritingLibrarians blog contains a wealth of advice on getting started.  The LSE Impact Blog is excellent for all issues relating to scholarly publishing, I would recommend that all librarians should follow it, whether you are engaging in research or supporting it.  There is an active international community of librarians who are interested in assessment and measurement, they meet at conferences like Library Assessment in the US and the International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries in the UK and publish in the above journals.  I'd be very happy to connect with anyone who wants to know more about practice-based research and share what knowledge and experience I've gained.
Overall, if you do engage in research and publication, my main advice to you is to continually observe yourself as researcher - see where you struggle, what obstacles and challenges you encounter and always think in the back of your head, where are the opportunities for the library to step in and help navigate the research journey.  Then put your librarian hat back on, turn your learning into action and make those opportunities happen in your library.



Jane Burns tips & insights


My research experience

The experience I have working in research is quite varied. For the CONUL presentation I focussed on my current experience of pursuing a PhD at University College Dublin in the School of Education.

Different Skills & Different Perspectives
Undertaking a PhD has been one of the best and most challenging decisions I have made. I am at the start of year 2 at UCD where I am working part time towards a PhD in Education- my intended area of research is medical humanities.  The experience is challenging primarily because of the amount of time and work involved- there are very few weekends off and my mind never stops thinking about the topic and what must be done.  It can also be a lonely space as much of the work and the thinking is done alone with minimum supervision.
Having library and research skills is a definite advantage in many ways in the PhD process. We understand the mechanics of sourcing, organising and disseminating content.  Having insight into the 360 view of the research process and knowing how to navigate the library and online resources the mechanics is extremely helpful. 
However, undertaking a PhD is a different kind of research experience. Here the researcher is as important an element to the research as the literature, the structures, the methodologies, and any other research activities.
This is where a challenge comes about- as a PhD researcher you must suspend your library perspective- as you move away from the management of information to an integral component of the research process.

Librarians and PhD’s
Why Librarians & PhD’s – seems to be a trend now as more librarians as they progress in their careers to want to undertake their own PhD research. For me this was inspired by librarian colleagues such as Mary Delaneyand John Cullen but also from colleagues from other professions, in particular Education whose passion and interests want to be developed.
What are the career possibilities with a PhD? In the field of Library and Information Studies this is not very clear cut but as we see our profession changing and evolving the possibilities may be there.  Opportunities to get involved in lecturing and other academic work. Teaching and Education are an interest of mine and that is why I am pursuing a PhD in Education.
Librarians tend to be generalists- also identified by the fact we know everything but many of us come from a range of different backgrounds and interests or have developed new ones and the opportunity to do research in these areas is appealing.
Librarian as Researcher- a natural space but one that must be developed. In the same way as it is so infuriating when others outside our profession think they could be librarians because they like books-there are skills as a researcher that need to be developed in order to move into this space.

Developing Critical Skills
Working on a PhD for me has been unlike any other research experience I have had. To be challenged that my primary goal is to create new knowledge is daunting. It takes an incredible amount of isolated time. Being a librarian certainly helps- I am very popular with my classmates but there is a learning curve that has to been undertaken to fully engage in the PhD research process. These are some of the critical skills required and that need constant development.
       Critical Thinking
       Research Methodologies
       Research Software/ Data Analysis
       Project Management & Organization
       Understand and synthesize large quantities of data
       Writing skills at all levels — brief abstract to book-length manuscript
       Analysis & Problem-Solving
       Collaboration and Funding
       Responsibility that you are creating new knowledge

As you can see there is a range of experience and range of perspectives in the writing, research and academic process for Librarians. It is important to keep in mind there are lots of colleagues available to help guide or answer questions. The most valuable resource by far is Helen Fallon from Maynooth University- she is someone who has given these authors and many others the confidence to put pen to paper to endeavour into areas of publishing which has changed the landscape for librarians.